Honor Thy Father and Thy Mother is the first Commandment with promise. It you do then it will be well with you and you can expect to live long upon the land that has been given to you.
A new law would force children to support their elderly parents. Amid changing conditions in India, family values are changing. In a bid to enforce familial obligations, the government has introduced a bill that will make it a legal obligation for children to support their parents.
Our modern age does not give the elderly the place of honor they had in earlier times and so richly deserve today. Bertrand Russell complained, "I was born in the wrong generation. When I was a young man, no one had any respect for youth. Now I am an old man and no one has any respect for age."A youth-centered culture is a backward-facing culture. It is a society in which people honor what they used to be instead of what they are going to be.
Age is like money. It isn't how much we have spent, but how much we have left. If we truly believe what we say we believe about eternal life, what we have left is forever. Every birthday takes us one year further from our birthdate and one year closer to Eternity.
This requirement has more to do with medical care, old-age pensions, and retirement homes than with disobedient minors. It means quite simply when your Mom and Dad have to depend on you, don't let them down. Honor your father and mother.
Although Social Security, Medicare, and old-age pensions have largely taken over the kind of responsibilities enjoined by this commandment, no system can honor your parents for you. Many systems are terribly impersonal and even insultingly dehumanizing.
When parents are no longer productive members of society, they need more than ever to be honored and reassured of their worth. Though children eventually outgrow their need to obey their parents, they never outgrow their duty to honor their parents. The time may come when aged parents must obey their children. But even then, and especially then, children must find ways to honor their parents, to affirm their dignity and worth.
Honor takes many different forms. It is much more than greeting cards, candy and flowers on Mother's Day. The way in which parents honor their children, for instance, differs from the way children honor their parents. It is a dishonor to treat everyone alike without respect to differing needs and responsibilities. True honor takes into account the age and situation of the people involved and the nature of the relationship. You're young only once, but you can stay immature the rest of your life.
One of the reasons that Chinese culture has survived thousands of years through many political and social revolutions is that through it all, they honored the elderly— not because it was spoken by God, or Moses, or Confucius, but because it was wise.

A new law in India will take India’s traditional strong sense of familial obligation into the stricter territory of legal statute. Surveys among India’s elderly have found that due to abandonment or gross neglect by children, the elderly population suffers from loneliness and isolation.
For many people the new law offers a chance for dignity and financial stability. The “Parents and Senior Citizens bill, 2007” says that adult children and grandchildren who earn incomes are required to maintain and take care of their parents or grandparents. Any relative of a senior citizen who is in possession of property or who stands to inherit the property of the concerned senior citizen would be liable to provide maintenance and support. The Law also says that those who refuse to provide support can face up to a month in jail.

Beyond the legal difficulties in enforcing the law, many parents say they would be reluctant to use the law to sue their own children. They want their children’s love and affection, not just their money. At present Indian society is not as litigious an American society. Should such a law go into effect in the United State, I dare say many children would find themselves in jail or in the same boat as the grand children of Leona Helmsley who were completely disinherited. She left $12 million to a dog named “Trouble”, and not a penny to the children of her body.
Helmsley died Aug. 20 at her Greenwich, Conn., home. She became known as a symbol of 1980s greed and earned the nickname "the Queen of Mean" after her 1988 indictment and subsequent conviction for tax evasion. One employee had quoted her as snarling, "Only the little people pay taxes."

Leona Helmsley's dog will continue to live an opulent life, and then be buried alongside her in a mausoleum. But two of Helmsley's grandchildren got nothing from the late luxury hotelier and real estate billionaire's estate.
Helmsley left her beloved white Maltese, named Trouble, a $12 million trust fund, according to her will, which was made public Tuesday, 28 August, in surrogate court in New York. It's not an outrageous amount considering that her estate is $8 billion, and then the dog only gets a fraction of 1 percent. This is just another reason to honor your father and mother. If the grandchildren had been more honorable, then perhaps “The Queen of Mean” would not have left them in the dog house.

Elvira Arellano is not the Mexican Rosa Parks.Non-violent Direct Action and the Civil Rights struggle have become they accepted model for many groups when the seek to challenge the status quo.
I am often offended when homosexuals try to compare their fight for acceptance of an aberant life style to the struggle by Black Americans for equal rights under the US Constitution. I am even more offended when felony law breakers try to claim the mantle of icons in the Civil Rights movement. Rosa Parks was such an icon. She was a symbol of the patience, and quiet dignity that Black Americans have exhibited during all of the years of "separate but equal" treatment in the land of their birth.


When she refused to give up her seat on a segregated Alabama bus, she was really standing up for the rights of all Americans born in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. Her peaceful protest was a quiet shout that said "I cannot take it any longer!"

She violated the law, a law that many right-thinking Americans considered an unjust law. It was an immoral law, but it was the law. As such, as a good American, Rosa Parks accepted her punishment. Then she worked within the system to change the law.
A recently deported Mexican alien has claimed to be the spiritual reincarnation of Rosa Parks.



Is Elvira Arellano -- the recently deported Mexican illegal alien -- the new Rosa Parks? Larry Elder says no. I have to agree with him. His argument is clear, cogent and convincing. Here is what he has to say about Elvira Arellano.
Some of her supporters describe her this way. But Arellano's credentials as a "role model," to say the least, fall short. Indeed, even some "immigrant rights activists" find the comparison embarrassing. A check of the websites of The National Council of La Raza and the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund finds no statement one way or the other concerning Arellano.
Rosa Parks, a black woman, was born in 1913 in Tuskegee, Alabama -- that is, Tuskegee, Alabama, United States of America. She thus entered life as an American citizen, but was denied the rights and protections afforded by the United States Constitution. Arellano sneaked into the country, not once, but twice, and defied a deportation order by receiving "sanctuary" for over a year in a Chicago church.
Arellano gave birth on American soil to a son, now 8. But she does not speak of his father. She condemns the U.S. government for "breaking up" her family because Saul (her son) remains in the United States while she reportedly lives with friends in Tijuana, Mexico. But Arellano chose to leave Saul behind, claiming that his Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder requires better medical care than provided in Mexico.
Arellano's justification for illegally crossing the border? "I came to the United States to work. I came because of what NAFTA and other U.S. economic policies have done to my country, in which I could no longer find work that paid a living wage." After her deportation to Mexico, she said, "The United States is the one who broke the law first. By letting people cross over [the border] without documents. By letting people pay taxes. . . . "
That's a new one.
As for the assertion that America "broke the law first," Arellano makes an interesting claim: the failure of America to effectively police its borders constitutes a criminal act that morally and legally justifies illegal entry into America. Arellano's insulting demands simply harden hearts. Instead of displaying even a hint of gratitude, she lectures American citizens that her son has the same rights as President Bush. Who said he didn't?
About NAFTA, most economists agree that it lessened the severity of several unrelated economic downturns, and, overall, improved the economic conditions in Mexico. A recent Investor's Business Daily editorial says that, post-NAFTA, "Mexicans find they have legitimate, legal jobs to do in Mexico . . . with the average Mexican income now at $7,000 -- the highest in Latin America -- average workers can earn nearly as much there as here."
The Mexican Senate greeted Arellano like a conquering hero. They immediately passed a measure demanding that the president of Mexico send a diplomatic note to President George W. Bush, protesting the deportation. Also, they promised to provide a scholarship for Arellano's son. (To be used where?)
Compared with nearly all European nations, America stands virtually alone in allowing children born on her soil by those who enter the country illegally to become citizens. Her son's status entitles him to all manner of state and federal programs, including taxpayer-provided K-12 education, and health and welfare benefits.
Despite the legal right to enter the Chicago church that provided "sanctuary" for Arellano for a year, authorities refused to enter. Immigration arrested her only after she left the church and after publicly announcing her intention to go to Washington and campaign for "immigrant rights." In Mexico, the law considers illegal entry a "crime punishable by up to 2 years in jail." Mexico forbids any illegal alien from participating in any sort of public demonstration. Years of corruption and bad economic policies have made poor a country rich in natural resources. Yet Arellano says nothing about Mexico, while blaming America for her "plight."
Some of us supported President Bush's approach for "comprehensive immigration reform" -- legalizing the status of most of those here illegally; a temporary worker program to take pressure off the border and especially to provide workers for industries like agriculture; a pathway to citizenship, providing applicants meet certain criteria; and an end to chain migration (the practice of allowing citizens to sponsor relatives for admittance, beyond spouses and minor children). It also makes sense to withhold federal funds from local law enforcement if they refuse to notify Immigration of the status of arrested illegal aliens. For those who enter the country illegally, the 14th Amendment should be amended to prevent so-called "anchor babies." We can then direct the finite resources of government to locating and expelling dangerous aliens. This makes political and practical sense.
Chest-thumping aliens like Arellano simply undermine their own cause.

They will never enjoy the Victory Lap that Rosa Parks was afforded.

The American Justice System was allowed to correct the wrongs that had been unfairly perpetrated upon her citizens of color. The race is not always to the swift; nor is the battle to the strong; but, it is to he who endures to the end. The moral arch of the universe is long, but it bends towards the positive. If you play the game, and you play to win, then you must obey the rules.